Nutanix Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Financial Results
CIOREVIEW >> >> NEWS

Nutanix Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Financial Results

CIO Review

SAN JOSE, Calif, Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTNX), a leader in hybrid multicloud computing, today announced financial results for its second quarter ended January 31, 2024.

“Our disciplined execution enabled us to deliver a solid second quarter financial performance against an uncertain, but stable macro backdrop,” said Rajiv Ramaswami, President and CEO of Nutanix. “We continue to remain focused on being a long-term strategic and innovative partner to our customers as they look to operate in a hybrid multicloud world.”

“Our second quarter results demonstrated a good balance of top and bottom line performance with 26% year-over-year ARR growth and strong free cash flow generation,” said Rukmini Sivaraman, CFO of Nutanix. “We also achieved GAAP operating profitability for the first time, reflecting the progress we’ve made in driving operating leverage in our model and optimizing the difference between our GAAP and non-GAAP results.”

Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Financial Summary

Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures, to the extent available, are provided in the tables of this press release.

Third Quarter Fiscal 2024 Outlook

Supplementary materials to this press release, including our second quarter fiscal 2024 earnings presentation, can be found at https://ir.nutanix.com/financial/quarterly-results.

Webcast and Conference Call Information

Nutanix executives will discuss the Company’s second quarter fiscal 2024 financial results on a conference call today at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time/1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. Interested parties may access the conference call by registering at this link to receive dial in details and a unique PIN number. The conference call will also be webcast live on the Nutanix Investor Relations website at ir.nutanix.com. An archived replay of the webcast will be available on the Nutanix Investor Relations website at ir.nutanix.com shortly after the call.

Footnotes

1Annual Contract Value, or ACV, is defined as the total annualized value of a contract, excluding amounts related to professional services and hardware. The total annualized value for a contract is calculated by dividing the total value of the contract by the number of years in the term of such contract, using, where applicable, an assumed term of five years for contracts that do not have a specified term. ACV Billings, for any given period, is defined as the sum of the ACV for all contracts billed during the given period.

2Annual Recurring Revenue, or ARR, for any given period, is defined as the sum of ACV for all non life-of-device contracts in effect as of the end of a specific period. For the purposes of this calculation, we assume that the contract term begins on the date a contract is booked, unless the terms of such contract prevent us from fulfilling our obligations until a later period, and irrespective of the periods in which we would recognize revenue for such contract.

3Average Contract Duration represents the dollar-weighted term, calculated on a billings basis, across all subscription and life-of-device contracts, using an assumed term of five years for life-of-device licenses, executed in the period.

4Revenue was negatively impacted by a year-over-year decline in the average contract duration, including as a result of Nutanix’s transition to a subscription-based business model.

5Weighted average share count used in computing diluted non-GAAP net income per share.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Key Performance Measures

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, this press release includes the following non-GAAP financial and other key performance measures: non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, free cash flow, Annual Contract Value Billings (or ACV Billings), Annual Recurring Revenue (or ARR), and Average Contract Duration. In computing non-GAAP financial measures, we exclude certain items such as stock-based compensation and the related income tax impact, costs associated with our acquisitions (such as amortization of acquired intangible assets, income tax-related impact, and other acquisition-related costs), costs related to the impairment and early exit of operating lease-related assets, restructuring charges, litigation settlement accruals and legal fees related to certain litigation matters, the amortization of the debt discount and issuance costs, interest expense related to convertible senior notes, gains on divestitures, and other non-recurring transactions and the related tax impact. Non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, and non-GAAP operating margin are financial measures which we believe provide useful information to investors because they provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance and liquidity by excluding certain expenses and expenditures such as stock-based compensation expense that may not be indicative of our ongoing core business operating results. Free cash flow is a performance measure that we believe provides useful information to our management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business after necessary capital expenditures, and we define free cash flow as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less purchases of property and equipment. ACV Billings is a performance measure that we believe provides useful information to our management and investors as it allows us to better track the topline growth of our business during our transition to a subscription-based business model because it takes into account variability in term lengths. ARR is a performance measure that we believe provides useful information to our management and investors as it allows us to better track the topline growth of our subscription business because it takes into account variability in term lengths. We use these non-GAAP financial and key performance measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. However, these non-GAAP financial and key performance measures have limitations as analytical tools and you should not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, and free cash flow are not substitutes for gross margin, operating expenses, operating income (loss), operating margin, or net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, respectively. There is no GAAP measure that is comparable to ACV Billings, ARR, or Average Contract Duration, so we have not reconciled the ACV Billings, ARR, or Average Contract Duration data included in this press release to any GAAP measure. In addition, other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures differently or may use other measures to evaluate their performance, all of which could reduce the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures as tools for comparison. We urge you to review the reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures included below in the tables captioned “Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Profit Measures” and “Reconciliation of GAAP Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities to Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow,” and not to rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. This press release also includes the following forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures as part of our third quarter fiscal 2024 outlook and/or our fiscal 2024 outlook: non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating margin, and free cash flow. We are unable to reconcile these forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures without unreasonable efforts, as we are currently unable to predict with a reasonable degree of certainty the type and extent of certain items that would be expected to impact the GAAP financial measures for these periods but would not impact the non-GAAP financial measures.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains express and implied forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements regarding: our business momentum and prospects, our third quarter fiscal 2024 outlook, and our fiscal 2024 outlook.

These forward-looking statements are not historical facts and instead are based on our current expectations, estimates, opinions, and beliefs. Consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements. The accuracy of these forward-looking statements depends upon future events and involves risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including factors that may be beyond our control, that may cause these statements to be inaccurate and cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied by such statements, including, among others: the inherent uncertainty or assumptions and estimates underlying our projections and guidance, which are necessarily speculative in nature; any failure to successfully implement or realize the full benefits of, or unexpected difficulties or delays in successfully implementing or realizing the full benefits of, our business plans, strategies, initiatives, vision, and objectives; our ability to achieve, sustain and/or manage future growth effectively; the rapid evolution of the markets in which we compete, including the introduction, or acceleration of adoption of, competing solutions, including public cloud infrastructure; failure to timely and successfully meet our customer needs; delays in or lack of customer or market acceptance of our new solutions, products, services, product features or technology; macroeconomic or geopolitical uncertainty, including supply chain issues; our ability to attract, recruit, train, retain, and, where applicable, ramp to full productivity, qualified employees and key personnel; factors that could result in the significant fluctuation of our future quarterly operating results (including anticipated changes to our revenue and product mix, the timing and magnitude of orders, shipments and acceptance of our solutions in any given quarter, our ability to attract new and retain existing end-customers, changes in the pricing and availability of certain components of our solutions, and fluctuations in demand and competitive pricing pressures for our solutions); our ability to form new or maintain and strengthen existing strategic alliances and partnerships, as well as our ability to manage any changes thereto; the impact of a pandemic or major public health concern; our ability to make share repurchases; and other risks detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2023 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on September 21, 2023 and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. Additional information will be set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2024, which should be read in conjunction with this press release and the financial results included herein. Our SEC filings are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at ir.nutanix.com and on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release and, except as required by law, we assume no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update, alter or otherwise revise any of these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or subsequent events or circumstances.

More in News

SAP Cloud ERP programs often become difficult to defend before implementation begins. Midmarket companies encounter long consulting estimates, broad license packages and development work priced beyond the original business case. Internal teams then face a second problem. They must support the project while continuing to maintain the processes the new system is supposed to replace. Implementation speed deserves close examination, but a shorter schedule alone is not enough. Buyers need to understand which activities have been standardized, how much preparation is required before kickoff and where customer-specific work can alter the timeline. A provider that promises rapid delivery without controlling scope may simply shift unfinished decisions into the post-launch period. The stronger model reduces repetitive configuration work while preserving enough review to prevent avoidable rework. “AutomationUI combines its public edition accelerator with license-rightsizing and independently available services that reduce the cost barrier for midmarket companies.” Public cloud adoption also changes the role of customization. SAP Cloud ERP Public Edition is built around standardized processes, making it less tolerant of years of local code and inherited exceptions. Providers must distinguish between a requirement that protects a real business condition and a preference carried over from the previous system. Excessive customization raises cost and maintenance effort. Rigid standardization can create workarounds that weaken adoption after launch. License planning creates a separate source of waste. User counts are often based on loose role definitions or projected demand that may not materialize for several years. Commercial incentives can compound the problem by encouraging a larger initial purchase than the organization requires. Buyers should expect role-based license mapping, realistic usage assumptions and a clear process for revisiting those decisions as the company grows. Post-launch use now matters more than migration completion. An ERP program has limited value when purchased functions remain unused or routine reporting requests return to long development queues. Providers should be judged on how they support adoption and how quickly they can handle practical changes once the system is live. Reusable services and AI-assisted development can shorten report or add-on work that would otherwise depend on lengthy ABAP coding, provided the provider maintains clear controls over quality and access. Commercial structure deserves similar attention. Large bundled engagements can force smaller companies to buy services before the need is clear. Independently available offerings give buyers more control over initial spending and allow them to add support as use expands. They also make provider comparison easier because implementation work and follow-on development can be assessed separately. AutomationUI is well aligned with companies that want SAP Cloud ERP Public Edition without accepting a conventional implementation cycle or an oversized service package. Its delivery model centers on an accelerator designed to automate much of the implementation process and support compressed go-live schedules. AutomationUI combines its public edition accelerator with license-rightsizing and independently available services that reduce the cost barrier for midmarket companies. Its AI-assisted development approach also targets reports and add-ons that would otherwise require extended ABAP work. AutomationUI’s model addresses the cost and adoption pressures that most often weaken midmarket SAP programs. ...Read more
Parking management solutions that incorporate technology, sensors, automation, and data analysis address significant urbanization challenges. They enhance parking operations, optimize space utilization, and improve the overall user experience. As cities strive to become smarter, these solutions are increasingly integrated into modern transportation systems. In contrast, traditional parking systems often rely on monitoring and static management, resulting in inefficient space usage, longer search times, and higher costs. Smart parking solutions do better by providing real-time information, automated access control, digital payment systems and guidance that helps drivers find parking spots. Modern platforms can handle on-street and off-street parking, allowing operators to manage facilities from a dashboard. Users get real-time information on parking availability and easy entry and exit experiences. As transportation networks become connected, smart parking management supports more efficient and sustainable city mobility. Enhanced Parking Solutions for Efficient Management Using sensors, cameras and other devices to keep track of which parking spaces are available so the people in charge can see what is going on and make the parking facility run smoothly. Smart parking systems help people find parking spaces more easily, which means they do not have to drive around the parking facility as much. Makes people happier when they are parking. These systems can read license plates and let people in without them having to take a ticket, which reduces the need for people to be involved and helps things run smoothly when it is busy. The way people pay for parking has become easier due to the ability to use phones or computers for transactions. The development increases convenience for those parking their vehicles and streamlines the payment collection process for parking facility operators. Parking facility managers can monitor activities across multiple locations, enabling them to optimize planning and resource allocation. They have access to real-time data on facility occupancy, revenue generation, and equipment functionality. The use of specialized analytical tools allows for the prediction of peak parking times. The information aids in determining pricing strategies and the number of parking spaces needed at any given time. The equipment within parking facilities is often connected to the internet, enhancing management capabilities. Facility operators can identify malfunctions promptly and schedule preventative maintenance, reducing potential issues. By leveraging automation, connectivity, and operational intelligence, smart parking management solutions promote efficient operations within parking facilities. Rising Need for Parking Management People want parking management solutions because cities and businesses need to manage the increasing number of vehicles and make the most of the limited parking spaces they have. The fact that more and more people are moving to cities is a reason for this demand. As cities get more crowded, it becomes really important to manage parking in a way to reduce traffic and make the transportation system better. Cities are trying to become smarter by using technologies. They are investing in systems that can manage traffic and parking together. “Artificial intelligence, connected mobility ecosystems and greater integration with intelligent transportation infrastructure will drive the future of parking management solutions.” Commercial real estate people are using parking technologies to make visitors happy to use their facilities in a better way and increase the value of their properties. The use of vehicles is changing the way parking is managed. Now parking facilities need to have charging stations, systems to reserve parking spots and ways to manage energy. The goal of being more sustainable is also helping the market grow. When people do not have to drive to find parking, they use less fuel, produce fewer emissions, and there is less traffic. People who manage parking use data to decide how much to charge, predict demand, plan how many parking spots they need, and make long-term investment decisions. The combination of cities getting bigger, the use of technologies and the need to make transportation better is driving investment in smart parking management solutions. Smart parking management solutions are getting more popular because cities, businesses and property owners need them to manage the growing number of vehicles and make the most of the parking resources they have. Emerging Trends in Smart Parking Management Solutions Artificial intelligence, connected mobility ecosystems and greater integration with intelligent transportation infrastructure will drive the future of parking management solutions. Parking management is becoming a dynamic part of urban mobility networks. AI will make parking management better by predicting how many spaces will be taken, analyzing traffic flow and automatically assigning parking spots. AI systems can help people who manage parking lots make sure they have enough spaces available when people need them. IoT will keep getting bigger, leading to more connected parking infrastructure with advanced sensors, smart cameras and intelligent gateways that give us information all the time. Smart parking management solutions will work with navigation systems, mobility applications and digital transportation platforms so drivers can find out if there are parking spaces available before they get to where they're going. As cities invest in transportation infrastructure, smart parking management solutions will become more important for making cities better, more efficient and more sustainable. ...Read more
AI data cloud solutions are rapidly reshaping how organizations handle large-scale information flows, as businesses move toward more connected and intelligence-driven digital environments. Companies are increasingly adopting unified cloud frameworks that combine advanced analytics with AI capabilities, enabling faster data processing and more responsive decision-making across operations. This shift is also improving scalability and system efficiency, though challenges around data security, integration complexity and governance continue to demand stronger architectural planning. In response, organizations are refining cloud strategies with more structured data management practices and enhanced security protocols to maintain reliability while supporting continuous innovation. What Are the Key Benefits of AI Data Cloud? AI data cloud delivers significant advantages by improving how organizations extract value from vast and diverse data sets. By bringing together structured and unstructured information into a unified environment, it allows deeper insights that support more accurate forecasting and strategic planning. This capability helps organizations move beyond surface-level analysis and build a more comprehensive understanding of operational patterns, customer behavior and market dynamics. Another important benefit is the speed and flexibility it introduces into data-driven processes. With faster access to insights, decision cycles become shorter and more responsive to changing conditions. This agility supports better coordination across departments and helps organizations adapt quickly to shifting priorities without disrupting ongoing activities. It also reduces dependency on fragmented data systems, creating a more streamlined and efficient flow of information across business functions. AI data cloud strengthens overall operational resilience by improving consistency and reliability in data usage. Automated data handling reduces manual effort and minimizes the risk of errors, ensuring that information remains accurate and dependable over time. This structured approach supports stronger compliance practices and enhances trust in data-driven decisions, helping organizations operate with greater confidence in complex and evolving environments. What is the Future Outlook of AI Data Cloud Solutions? AI data cloud solutions are expected to advance toward more autonomous and context-aware data ecosystems, where systems can interpret patterns, prioritize insights and initiate actions with minimal manual direction. Growing integration of machine learning models with dynamic data pipelines is likely to support more proactive decision environments, where insights are not only generated faster but are also aligned more closely with real-time operational needs. This progression is set to refine how organizations anticipate changes, manage complexity and respond to emerging demands across digital environments. Simultaneously, the evolution of decentralized data architectures and edge computing is anticipated to reshape how data is processed and accessed across distributed networks. Greater emphasis on interoperability standards and secure data exchange frameworks will support more seamless collaboration between platforms while maintaining control over sensitive information. These developments are positioning AI data cloud solutions as a core element in building more adaptive, scalable and intelligence-driven digital infrastructures. ...Read more
Enterprise innovation sandboxes often lose their usefulness at the boundary between experimentation and production. A team may prove an idea quickly, then encounter weeks of access requests, security reviews and infrastructure dependencies before the work can enter the enterprise environment. For executives assessing a sandbox, the relevant distinction is whether it merely creates a protected place to experiment or shortens the path from an approved idea to deployable work. Production similarity deserves close scrutiny. A sandbox that operates under different tools or controls can make early development seem faster while delaying integration work. The stronger model reflects the conditions a team will eventually face, including access rules and deployment requirements. Governance then becomes part of development rather than a review layer added later. That matters particularly for AI work, where an experiment can be easy to demonstrate but much harder to sustain once enterprise data and release practices come into play. Self-service creates another procurement problem. Removing every gate may increase speed during experimentation, but it can also leave IT having to rebuild control later. Excessive centralization has the opposite effect, forcing routine provisioning through ticket queues and approval chains. Buyers should assess whether administrators can establish reusable policies and templates while giving teams room to provision approved resources themselves. The practical measure is not unrestricted autonomy. It is how much waiting and repeated setup the environment removes without separating experimentation from enterprise oversight. “The Calibo model works with existing enterprise systems rather than requiring their replacement and connects experimentation to a controlled Path to Production.” Compatibility with the existing technology estate is equally important. Large enterprises rarely have a clean stack that can be replaced around a new sandbox. Multiple clouds may coexist with legacy systems, while development work passes between specialized tools and data platforms. A sandbox that demands wholesale replacement can turn adoption into another modernization program. Buyers need to understand how the environment coordinates work across existing systems and whether generated artifacts remain inspectable and modifiable rather than being locked inside the platform. Data readiness can expose the same weakness. Requiring every possible source to be prepared before experimentation begins creates unnecessary groundwork, yet loosely governed sample data may produce a result that cannot survive production review. A useful sandbox should let teams establish the trusted data required for a defined use case, preserve traceability and expand that foundation as the work progresses. This keeps data preparation proportional to the idea being tested while preserving a credible route beyond the prototype. That balance between usable data and production readiness is built into the Calibo approach. Calibo provides a Business Innovation Sandbox, a governed environment designed to mirror production conditions. It gives teams role-based tools and workflows. IT can predefine approved configurations and access rules through policies and templates, allowing teams to provision what they need without sending every request through a manual approval queue. Its model works with existing enterprise systems rather than requiring their replacement. Calibo’s Path to Production provides a controlled release process for moving validated work into enterprise or Calibo-managed environments while IT retains control over deployment requirements. Calibo also applies Minimum Viable Data to establish the trusted, governed data required for a specific use case instead of preparing every possible source in advance. These mechanics address the central procurement risk of creating a sandbox that accelerates prototypes but leaves production friction untouched. Calibo merits consideration where enterprises need experimentation to remain governed and connected to eventual deployment. ...Read more